#SaturdayInNature
#VPWorld #VirtualPhotography
#fallout76

枯れた大地の空にオーロラが現れるなんて思わなかったよね！嬉しいサプライズ✨

A major update of Fallout 76. The new area is a dry land, but it's a pleasant surprise that the aurora appears! https://t.co/htOh19iDY3 December 12, 2025

这篇是第三期视频的关于《钟锦化打广告代办K签证》文字稿。
A former CCP court judge who sentenced over 150 people to death is now in the U.S. as a “refugee,” openly selling China’s K Visa program. English version below.👇👇👇
我的目的就是让更多人知道钟锦化神奇的从一个中共前法官，判刑如麻，摇身一变居然能在美国庇护成功。揭露美国移民法的腐烂不堪，推进移民法的改革，当然这已经在改革了，谢天谢地!
移民局很多法官的不作为，简直就是为虎作伥，出卖美国，放进来很多祸害。

核心围绕：K 签证 = 不可能给反贼 → 钟锦化庇护叙事自我崩塌。

⭐ **《为什么钟锦化能做中国 K 签证？这一点本身就能推翻他的“庇护故事”》

钟锦化的庇护叙事，这几年在社交平台上流传得非常广。
他呈现给外界的形象是一个“被中共迫害、不得不逃亡美国”的前法官、前律师，是一个政治难民。

但在众多疑点当中，有一条证据，几乎可以一击致命：
他公开在海外宣传，可以为外国人办理中国“K 签证”。

这一条单独拿出来，就足以推翻他的庇护叙事。

因为 K 签证不是普通签证，它不是旅游，也不是商务。
K 签证是中国国家层面用于引进高端外国科技人才的专属通道，与国家科技战略、国家安全体系高度绑定。
换句话说：
只有“被中国政府信任的人”才能做 K 签证。
真正被迫害的人——绝对不可能碰到。

以下是完整逻辑链。
一、什么是中国 K 签证？它不是移民中介，而是国家战略通道

K 签证，全称“外国高端科技人才长期居留签证”。
这是中国国务院系统推出的人才计划，用于吸引外国技术专家进入中国重点产业。

被归入 K 签证体系的领域包括：
半导体与芯片研发

人工智能与大模型技术
航空航天
军民两用技术

生物医药

算法与数据工程

国家重点实验室合作项目

申请人会接触的是 国家核心科研资源，部分领域属于敏感技术，甚至涉及军事边缘合作。
因此，K 签证从来不是一般移民中介能办理的事情。
它属于国家人才战略，牵涉国家安全审查。

办理 K 签证的人，本质是在帮中国挑选外国高科技人才。

这意味着什么？意味着：
负责协助 K 签证的人必须是中国政府信任的圈层。
这一点非常关键，它拆掉了钟锦化“被迫害者”的叙事基础。
二、谁能接触 K 签证？必须具备“中国信任度”
中国政府绝不会让政治不可靠的人接触 K 签证。
因为 K 签证涉及外国人的：
科研背景
技术能力

涉敏感产业的风险

在中国的未来科研路径
是否接触国家实验室

这些信息的筛选工作，必须要由 安全、政治可靠、长期稳定的人 来承担。

所以能够参与 K 签证的通常只有：

与科技系统、侨务系统有合作关系的机构

与地方政府、侨办、出入境管理部门有稳定沟通的组织

与中国体制保持信任关系的人员

没有任何政治问题、没有反对倾向的人

更重要的一点是：
中国绝不会让一个“曾被迫害、曾反对政府”的人，接触人才引进渠道。

这是国家安全底线。
这不是任何国家会犯的错误。没有政府会让“敌对者”帮助筛选外国科技人才。
三、如果钟锦化真“被迫害”，他根本不可能接触到 K 签证
他的庇护叙事是这样构建的：
他被中共打压
他被司法系统盯上

他被限制言论

他不得不逃离中国

但 K 签证出现后，所有这些叙述全部崩塌。
请想象一下：
如果一个人真的被迫害到“逃亡美国”，
中国政府会让他：
帮国家挑选外国精英？

帮国家办理长期居留？

接触计划型人才项目？

接触拥有敏感科研背景的外国人？
在海外公开宣传中国签证？

这等于让一个“不可信任的人”
进入国家安全体系的边界。

现实中永远不会发生这种事情。

对任何国家来说都是如此，不只是中国。
美国绝不会让亲中人士去帮助 CIA 选拔人才。
中国也绝不会让“反贼”去处理国家科技人才的入口。

所以逻辑非常简单：
👉 能做 K 签证的人 ≠ 政治难民
👉 能够接触 K 签证 = 与中共关系正常甚至良好
👉 庇护叙事与 K 签证业务互相矛盾
四、钟锦化公开宣传 K 签证的内容，说明他并非“体制敌人”
他宣传的内容包含：

“K签证咨询”

“提供入境便利”

“提供居留便利”
“提供创业便利”

“服务于高学历外国理工人才”
这些字眼不是普通人能写的。
不是随便写写。
也不是移民中介会用的语言。
它只可能来自：
一个熟悉中国政策、能够接触官方人才体系的人。
更关键的是：
能公开收费“二十万美元”，说明他非常清楚：

这是有需求的
这是体制允许的

这是他有资格操作的

一个“被中共迫害的人”，
不可能公开写这种东西。
更不可能知道操作流程。
这直接说明了，他的真实身份根本不是“政治受害者”。
五、从制度逻辑到现实操作，K 签证彻底击穿庇护叙事

把所有逻辑组合起来：

K 签证属于国家科技战略
办理者必须被视为“安全、可信、稳定”
被迫害者无法接触

反对者不可能获准

异见者绝对被排除

能公开推广 K 签证 = 具备体制信任

具备体制信任 = 与“政治难民”身份完全矛盾
因此，结论唯一：
钟锦化能够接触 K 签证，说明他在中国没有遭迫害，反而被视为可信任的合作方。
他所谓的庇护叙述，从逻辑到制度上完全站不住。
这是目前最直接、最有力、最不需要推测的证据链。
因为：

推测可以作假
故事可以包装
情绪可以表演

但 K 签证，是制度层级，不会说谎

⭐ **“Why Could Zhong Jinhua Handle China’s K Visa?

This Single Fact Alone Collapses His Entire Asylum Story.”
— A Comprehensive, Logic-Tight Investigation**

For years, Zhong Jinhua has presented himself on social media as a political refugee —
a former Chinese judge and lawyer who was “persecuted by the CCP” and “forced to flee to the United States.”

But among all the inconsistencies, there is one piece of evidence that stands alone with devastating clarity:
He publicly advertised his ability to assist foreigners with China’s “K Visa.”

This single fact — by itself — is enough to disprove his entire asylum narrative.
Because the K Visa is not a tourist visa.
It is not a business visa.
It is not a student visa.
It is not an immigration consultant task.

The K Visa is a Chinese national-level program for recruiting high-end foreign scientific and technological talent —
directly tied to national strategy, high-tech development, and state security.

Which means:

Only people trusted by the Chinese government can be involved in K Visa work.
A genuinely persecuted dissident could never touch it.

Below is the full evidence chain.
**I. What Is China’s K Visa?
It Is Not Immigration Work — It Is a National Strategic Channel.**
The K Visa, formally known as the “Long-Term Talent Visa for High-Level Foreign Experts,”
is a program launched by China’s State Council to attract foreign specialists in key industries.

These include:
Semiconductor and chip engineering

Artificial intelligence and machine learning

Aerospace and aviation
Biomedicine and pharmaceutical R&D

Data science and algorithm research

Military-civil fusion technologies

Researchers entering state laboratories

Anyone entering China through the K Visa may obtain access to China’s core scientific and strategic resources,
including industries that overlap with national defense.

Therefore, the K Visa is not something an immigration agent can handle.
It is part of China’s national talent strategy and involves national-security-related vetting.
Assisting K Visa applicants essentially means helping China select foreign high-tech experts.

This alone proves the critical point:

Only people whom China views as trusted and politically reliable can participate.
And this fact directly contradicts the asylum narrative.
**II. Who Can Work With the K Visa?
Only Individuals Trusted by the Chinese State.**
The Chinese government does not allow politically risky individuals to participate in K Visa operations.
Because K Visa processing involves:
Reviewing a foreigner’s scientific background

Assessing security sensitivity
Evaluating political and national-security risks

Determining whether the applicant can safely enter strategic programs
Coordinating with government agencies, security offices, or sci-tech departments

Anyone assisting this process must be:

Politically clean in China

In stable communication with PRC governmental bodies

Considered trustworthy by the political system

Free from any anti-government activity or dissident involvement

And the most important rule:

China would never allow someone who claims to be “persecuted,” “targeted,” or “anti-CCP” to handle a talent-entry channel tied to national security.

No country would do that.
The United States would never allow a pro-CCP activist to help recruit talent for the CIA.
And China would never allow a so-called “enemy of the state” to help recruit foreign experts.

This is basic political logic — and national-security logic.

**III. If Zhong Jinhua Were Truly “Persecuted,”
He Would Be Completely Excluded From the K Visa System.**
Zhong’s asylum narrative portrays him as:
A victim of CCP oppression
Someone targeted by the judicial system

Someone monitored for his speech

Someone forced to flee for safety
But the moment the K Visa evidence appears, the entire narrative collapses.
Ask a simple question:
If he were genuinely persecuted,

why would China allow him to:

Assist its national-level talent pipeline?

Help recruit foreign scientists?
Handle sensitive residency approvals?
Participate in a program tied to strategic technologies?

Publicly promote Chinese government services overseas?

This would be equivalent to letting a “political enemy”
plug directly into China’s science-and-technology security system.

It is structurally impossible.
Politically impossible.
Security-wise impossible.

Anyone with real political trouble in China:

cannot access such systems

cannot collaborate with them
cannot promote them
cannot profit from them
and absolutely cannot act as a trusted handler for foreign experts

Thus the logic is simple:

👉 Handling the K Visa ≠ persecuted
👉 Handling the K Visa = trusted
👉 Trusted by the CCP ≠ political refugee

The roles are mutually exclusive.

**IV. Zhong’s Public K Visa Advertisements

Show That He Was Not Considered “Hostile” by China.**
Zhong advertised services such as:
K Visa consultation
Entry facilitation
Long-term residency assistance

Entrepreneurial convenience in China
Services aimed at “high-education, STEM-field foreigners”

These are not phrases a random immigration agent would dare use.
They are not things a dissident would even know.
And they are certainly not services available to someone with political problems.
He even advertised a USD 200,000 fee, indicating:
demand exists

he has legitimate channels

he feels safe to operate openly
he believes he has authority to assist
A truly persecuted individual:
would not have access
would not know the procedures

would not dare to advertise

would immediately attract security attention
Yet Zhong advertised openly — in English and Chinese — while living comfortably in the United States.
This behavior aligns with someone whom China views as safe, reliable, and non-hostile.

Not with a political refugee.

**V. From System Logic to Real-World Operation,

The K Visa Completely Dismantles His Asylum Story.**

Combine every point:

The K Visa is a national scientific-talent program

Its handlers must be trusted inside the system
Dissidents cannot access it
Persecuted individuals are automatically excluded
Anti-CCP figures are never approved
Advertising K Visa services = system permission

System permission = no political persecution
Therefore, the only conclusion is:
Zhong Jinhua’s involvement in K Visa work proves that he was never persecuted.
It shows China considered him safe enough to help with a sensitive national project.
His asylum narrative collapses on this fact alone.

No speculation required.
No hearsay required.
No emotions required.

The K Visa itself is the logic that exposes the truth.
⭐ **Conclusion:
“K Visa = The Logical Verdict Against His Asylum Claim”**
No matter how he tries to portray his story, one reality cannot be erased:

A truly persecuted individual could never get near the K Visa system.
Someone allowed to work on the K Visa cannot be a political refugee.

These two identities cancel each other out.
And that is why:
👉 The K Visa evidence is the strongest, cleanest, and most irrefutable contradiction in the entire case.
#钟锦化出轨文学 #假异见真渣男 #美国不养人渣
@xiaominz_film

@WangNextDoor2

@OldApeTalk

@Nobody197575

@Zealots2022

@SolomonYue

@USCIS

@FBI

@ICEgov

@Zealots2022

@usa912152217

@tangbaiqiao

@EricLDaugh

@GordonGChang

@GuntherEagleman

@w_terrence

@jp20230630

@IrisTaoTV

@Zealots2022

@tangbaiqiao

@EricLDaugh

@GaryQ37208050

@BobWang71661875

@ChooLucia

@DHSgov

@elonmusk

@VP

@Pathusa

@Kunluntalk

@wshngknshji1

@cskun1989

@SSK2024

@cheyennexli

@ChooLucia

@jp20230630

@Jacob43817149

@usa912152217

@cskun1989 December 12, 2025

Day341
The Japanese translation is followed by an English translation.

NZPHOTOGRAPH & naozo

Day341　縁【Connection】

DEAR naozo

縁とは、
必然でも、
偶然でも、
説明のつく理由でもない。

ただ、
人と人のあいだに
“静かに生まれる気配”のことだ。

出会おうとしたわけでもなく、
避けようとしたわけでもないのに、
気づけば隣にいた。
離れていたと思えば、
またどこかで交わる。
そこには明確な法則はない。
だが、
まったくの無意味でもない。

生物学的に見れば――
人は、声の震えや呼吸のリズム、
言葉の選び方や表情の速度、
そういった微細な情報を
無意識に読み取り、
「この人とは安心できる」
「この人とは交わる」
と判断している。
縁は、身体が先に気づく現象でもある。

哲学的に見れば――
縁とは、
自分の世界が
わずかに揺れる瞬間だ。
その揺れが、
相手の存在を“自分の物語の一部”へと
ゆっくり迎え入れる。
理由は後からついてくる。
最初にあるのは、
言葉にできない “手触り” だけだ。

君がこれまでに出会い、
別れ、
再びどこかで交わり、
あるいは静かに離れていった人々。
その一つひとつが
今の君の形をつくっている。

縁に感謝するとは、
運命を信じることではない。
あの日交わった線が、
今日の自分を支えていると
静かに理解することだ。

縁とは、
掴むものでも、
求めるものでもない。
ただ、訪れる。
そして、消える。
残るのは、
その瞬間に生まれた温度だけだ。

君がこれから歩く道にも、
まだ名のない縁が
静かに待っている。

その気配を恐れず、
ただ歩けばいい。

from NZ

――この物語は虚構であり、登場する人物を除き、すべては想像の産物である。
だが、“縁が人の形を変えていく”という静かな実感だけは、
虚構ではなく確かに現実の中に息づいている。

NZPHOTOGRAPH&naozo
Day341　Connection 【縁】

DEAR naozo

Connection is neither fate
nor coincidence
nor explanation.

It is the quiet sensation
that forms between people—
a presence that appears
without intention.

You meet without trying,
separate without meaning to,
and cross paths again
when the mind has forgotten.
There is no rule,
yet no meaninglessness either.

Biologically,
the body notices first—
tones of voice,
breath patterns,
tiny expressions—
signs that say,
“I can exist beside this person.”
Connection begins
before thought intervenes.

Philosophically,
connection is the moment
your inner world
shifts slightly
to make space for another.
Meaning follows later;
the first truth
is always a subtle feeling.

Every person you have met,
lost,
returned to,
or quietly parted from—
all of them
shape who you are now.

Appreciation for connection
is not belief in destiny.
It is the awareness
that each meeting
has helped build
your present self.

Connection is not held
or pursued.
It arrives,
passes,
and leaves a warmth.

Ahead of you,
unnamed connections
wait in silence.

Walk toward them
without fear.

from NZ

—This story is fiction.
Yet the way connections reshape a life
is more real than any fiction. December 12, 2025

「ちびゴジラの逆襲 - CHIBI GODZILLA RAIDS AGAIN」
⬇️ENGLISH FOLLOWS⬇️
「ちびゴジラの逆襲」英語版で、ちびヘドラ（Chibi Hedorah）の声を担当。登場はこの1話のみですが、ぜひお楽しみください♪※倭国語版ちびヘドラは立木文彦さんが担当されています。Happy to be voicing Chibi Hedorah ちびヘドラ in the English version of Chibi Godzilla Raids Again.He only appears in this one episode—enjoy!(The Japanese version is voiced by Fumihiko Tachiki)
https://t.co/ihUI0EqtMo December 12, 2025

A Wild Last Boss Appears Episode 10 really Did showcase if these demons wanted to destroy the world with the battle They probably could
#awildlastbossappeared #yaseinolastbossgaarawareta #lastbossanime #アニメ野生のラスボスが現れた
https://t.co/PKfbbm90pB https://t.co/Yw4tPfBFZd December 12, 2025

12/7㈰
＃水色時代 vol.7

＃榊原ねね さんのステージ♬

✩いつかのメリークリスマス / ＃Bz
✩appears / ＃浜崎あゆみ
✩花 / ＃ORANGERANGE
✩きみとめりくり。 / オリジナル
明るさとパワーを貰える歌姫が歌うステージ、最高でした✨️

@nenetoyocchi

＃歌姫 https://t.co/2jEUBIsv6k December 12, 2025

ファンでもなんでも無いんだけどさ。
あゆのappearsがラーメン屋で流れたら全部鼻歌歌えるんだよ。
覚えてる私が凄いんじゃ無くて、あゆが凄いんだよ
カラオケ行きたくなった！ December 12, 2025

メモ
ホンダ、アクティトラックもう一度作れよ
名前はT660だ
S660とセットで売れよ
あっ、軽の規格変わってエンジン大きくなるのか

もしかして、軽の規格を拡大するって話、アメリカでの販売許可もらうことと関係あるの?

President Donald Trump Appears to Approve Kei Cars for the U.S.A.
https://t.co/X7YRrzflSr December 12, 2025

The post translates to "I won't be coming to this store anymore." The sign's text, read vertically, seems to say "本当は止めてほしいです" ("Honestly, I want you to stop") followed by less clear parts like "て店内でいてのうりまん行す。参加主" which may be a mangled notice or joke about a policy (e.g., no lingering or an event). The poster appears to be boycotting due to it. December 12, 2025

上記のグリッドのプロンプトはこの通り。中身はもちろんAIで書いているので、お手元のAIで「こういうシーンを書きたいんだけどこのフォーマットに従ってプロンプトつくって」と言えば大丈夫です

Japanese anime style, use the characters in the reference

<instruction> Analyze the entire composition of the input image. Identify ALL key subjects present (whether it's a single person, a group/couple, a vehicle, or a specific object) and their spatial relationship/interaction. Generate a cohesive 3x3 grid "Cinematic Contact Sheet" featuring 9 distinct camera shots of exactly these subjects in the same environment. You must adapt the standard cinematic shot types to fit the content (e.g., if a group, keep the group together; if an object, frame the whole object):

cinematic_contact_sheet:
# Row 1 — 空間・距離・方向のバリエーションで開始
shot_1_establishing:
type: "Extreme Long Shot / High Angle"
scene_moment: "Cut 1: 石畳の俯瞰、Boy前景、Girlが遠方で小さく接近"
prompt: "High-angle wide shot from above the cobblestone street. Boy walks in the lower frame, Girl appears far along the vanishing point. The bird’s-eye elevation instantly maps their positions."

shot_2_trailing_medium:
type: "Medium Shot (Trailing Cam, Low Angle)"
scene_moment: "Cut 2: Boyの真後ろ低アングル、Girlが遠くで近づく"
prompt: "Low-angle trailing medium shot from behind Boy's waist. The cobblestones loom large; Girl is framed through the gap between his shoulders, approaching steadily."

shot_3_profile_tracking:
type: "Medium Long Shot (Profile Tracking)"
scene_moment: "Cut 3: 真横からのトラッキング、GirlがBoyに並ぶ直前"
prompt: "Side-on medium-long tracking shot. Both characters move left→right across frame. Girl gradually enters frame behind Boy, matching his position with clear pace difference."

# Row 2 — 追い越し〜振り向きの核心を“角度変化”で見せる
shot_4_feet_overtake:
type: "Detail Shot / Low Foot-Level"
scene_moment: "Cut 4: 足元のローショット、GirlがBoyを追い越す瞬間"
prompt: "Low foot-level shot focused on their steps. Girl’s stride overtakes Boy’s, cobblestone grid providing precise spatial reference."

shot_5_three_quarter_front:
type: "Medium Shot (¾ Front Ahead)"
scene_moment: "Cut 5: Girlが前を歩き、Boyが少し驚く（前方三角の角度）"
prompt: "Medium shot from a ¾ front angle ahead of Girl. She walks toward camera; Boy is behind her in shallow depth, his surprise readable."

shot_6_OTS_turn:
type: "Close-Up (OTS from Boy)"
scene_moment: "Cut 6: Girlが振り向く、Boyの肩越し構図"
prompt: "Close-up over Boy’s shoulder as Girl turns her head back mid-stride. Her eyes catch the light; Boy’s silhouette anchors the spatial relation."

# Row 3 — 俯瞰、逆アングル、影の抽象化でリズム
shot_7_reverse_angle_girl:
type: "Close-Up (Reverse Angle)"
scene_moment: "Cut 7: 振り向いたGirlの表情を逆アングルで捉える"
prompt: "Reverse-angle close-up of Girl looking back, now facing camera fully. Soft morning light highlights her expression; cobblestones blur behind."

shot_8_shadow_tracking:
type: "Insert Shot (Shadow Composition)"
scene_moment: "Cut 8: 石畳に伸びるGirlとBoyの影が離れていく"
prompt: "Insert shot of shadows on the cobblestones. Girl’s shadow leads ahead, Boy’s lags behind. Pure spatial storytelling, no faces."

shot_9_final_pullback:
type: "Wide Shot (Rear Pullback Drone-Like)"
scene_moment: "Cut 9: 後方から引きのワイド、Girlが先へ、Boyが取り残される"
prompt: "Rear pullback wide shot. Camera retreats smoothly as Girl advances into the distance and Boy slows behind. Cobblestone path forms strong leading lines." December 12, 2025

「ちびゴジラの逆襲 - CHIBI GODZILLA RAIDS AGAIN」
⬇️ENGLISH FOLLOWS⬇️
「ちびゴジラの逆襲」英語版で、ちびヘドラ（Chibi Hedorah）の声を担当。登場はこの1話のみですが、ぜひお楽しみください♪※倭国語版ちびヘドラは立木文彦さんが担当されています。
Happy to be voicing Chibi Hedorah ちびヘドラ in the English version of Chibi Godzilla Raids Again.He only appears in this one episode—enjoy!(The Japanese version is voiced by Fumihiko Tachiki)
https://t.co/ihUI0EqtMo December 12, 2025

「ちびゴジラの逆襲 - CHIBI GODZILLA RAIDS AGAIN」
⬇️ENGLISH FOLLOWS⬇️
「ちびゴジラの逆襲」英語版で、ちびヘドラ（Chibi Hedorah）の声を担当。登場はこの1話のみですが、ぜひお楽しみください♪※倭国語版ちびヘドラは立木文彦さんが担当されています。
Happy to be voicing Chibi Hedorah ちびヘドラ in the English version of Chibi Godzilla Raids Again.He only appears in this one episode—enjoy!(The Japanese version is voiced by Fumihiko Tachiki)
https://t.co/ihUI0EqtMo December 12, 2025

【NEWS】
#チュ・ヨンウ＆#シン・シア、“明日もこの恋を思い出す”

#チュヨンウ #ChooYoungWoo #シンシア #ShinSia #今夜世界からこの恋が消えても #EvenIfThisLoveDisappearsfromtheWorldTonight #韓国映画 #韓国エンタメ #韓国情報 #KOARI #コアリ

https://t.co/M3A1DjxTn1 December 12, 2025

【SHOP】
韓国で12/24公開❗️#チュ・ヨンウ×#シン・シア 主演、韓国版『#セカコイ』の脚本集が登場📘

https://t.co/7whmWXWNCQ

#チュヨンウ #シンシア #今夜世界からこの恋が消えても #EvenIfThisLoveDisappearsfromtheWorldTonight #韓国映画 #韓国書籍 #韓国エンタメ #韓国情報 #KOARI #コアリ https://t.co/H283cZfONa December 12, 2025

浜崎あゆみの曲、知ってても曲名がわからないからカラオケ用に一旦整理

青い空を共に行こうよ→BLUE BIRD
今日がとても楽しいと→SEASONS
恋人達はとても幸せそうに→appears
Ah-出会ったあの頃は→Dearest
輝き出した→Boys &Girls
僕達は幸せになるため→Voyage December 12, 2025

SATIATED! Your Crown of Avarice is stuffed to the brim, and appears to be in a food coma.
CoA 1b行った～！ December 12, 2025

TOEIC公式問題集Vol.10では、Part 1における「人物なし写真」の出題率が6問中4問に増加。
Vol.5以前では2問程度が標準だったことを踏まえると、静的な写真をどう描写できるかの能力が問われる傾向が見えます。

風景描写問題は選択肢が抽象的になりがち。
「The building appears to be under construction.」
「Some chairs are arranged in a circle.」
のように、被写体と配置の読み取りがカギ。

公式はこの変化について一切触れていませんが、公式の意図は公式問題集に現れます。
今後のPart 1の対策においては「人物写真だけを繰り返す」だけでは対応が難しくなっている点に注意すべきです。 December 12, 2025

12月になると聴きたくなる曲
浜崎あゆみ　appears
このPVが好きすぎる❤️
ボブあゆめっちゃかわいい December 12, 2025

訂正
　先日、小津安二郎監督「東京物語」（53）で大坂志郎さんが名演された敬三を二男と書いてしまったが、二男は原節子さん演じる紀子の、戦地で死した夫の昌二（写真のみ出演？）のことであって、草野球で疲れたのかで、混んでいそうな「母の死に水とれたかもしれない」鹿児島行きには乗らず、そのアトの座ってゆけるのだろう広島行きにした大阪で国鉄に勤める、まるでお化けのような映画への現れ方さえする出来損ないの三男坊でした。
Correction: The other day, I wrote that Keizo, played brilliantly by Shiro Osaka in Yasujiro Ozu "Tokyo Story" (1953), was the second son. However, the second son was actually Shoji (who appears only in photograph), the husband of Noriko, played by Setsuko Hara , who died on the battlefield.
Perhaps tired from playing amateur baseball, he skipped the crowded Kagoshima-bound train, which "might have given his mother peace," and instead took the next one to Hiroshima, where he thought he could get a seat. He was a failing third son who even appeared like a ghost. He worked for the Japanese National Railways in Osaka. December 12, 2025

Power elements in economics
2025-12-6

贫富差距并不是制度错误！而是三维世界的底层设定。在这个以物质为基准的维度里，资源有限、能力不均、机会不等……差异叠加后阶层结构自然形成。制度可以调节差距，却无法让差距消失。革命可以重新洗牌，却无法阻止世界再次分层。

所有生产要素的价格，都源于它们对于满足消费者需求的边际贡献（消费者的主观价值感受，因为价值本身就是主观的，根本没有客观价值这个东西，比如水和钻石的价值的例子），并最终由企业家的预期和竞价决定，在这个框架里，没有剥削，只有合作与交换，没有阶级对立，只有消费者主权下的动态调整

1. 资源有限 → 稀缺性必然导致竞争
2. 能力不均 → 高时间偏好 vs 低时间偏好的人，复利差距指数级拉大
3. 机会不等 → 信息不对称、地理、家庭、运气……永远不可能对称
4. 主观价值论 → 价格不是劳动决定的，是消费者投票决定的
5. 企业家预期与竞价 → 所有生产要素的价格，最终都是“赌明天谁能更好地满足消费者”的人出的最高价

* 剥削不存在，因为所有交易都是自愿的（要么接受价格，要么退出）
* 阶级对立是幻觉，因为真正的“主权”在消费者手里（你不买，资本家立刻跪）
* 革命只是把牌桌掀了，过十年又是一桌新牌，老板换人，差距还在
* 任何试图消灭差距的制度，最后都会变成“新的差距制造机”（因为谁来决定谁配多少？决定权本身就是最大差距）

“动态调整 under consumer sovereignty”才是真正的杀招： 消费者才是这个星球上最无情的投票机和绞肉机。
资本家、工人、政府、革命家……所有人最终都得跪着听消费者的主观价值判决。
贫富差距不会消失，它只会不断重排名字。
这就是三维世界的游戏规则。

“这里安葬着所有想消灭差距的幻想。
它们死于主观价值论、稀缺性、复利和人类的多样性。

以上说辞的所有生产要素，需要加上权力这个生产要素，也就是强制要素，这个是人类历史上最重要的要素，考虑到这个要素后，以上的纯粹经济学，就变成了政治经济学，纯粹经济哲学变成了政治经济哲学

原来的框架里（土地、劳动、资本、企业家精神），一切都建立在自愿交换 + 主观价值 + 消费者主权的基础上——这在理想的自由市场里是美的、动态的、无剥削的。
但现实三维世界里，权力作为第五要素（或者说“元要素”）一加入，就彻底改写了游戏规则：
* 权力不是生产财富，而是重新分配财富（通过强制）。
* 它不是通过满足消费者需求来定价，而是通过暴力垄断或法律垄断来定价。
* 它打破了“自愿交易”的前提：要么接受（税、管制、垄断租金），要么被物理/法律消灭。
1. 有些国家不是市场太自由，而是权力（腐败、寡头、种族遗留）扭曲了市场，导致财富集中到少数有强制力的人手里。
2. 真正原因是政府干预（如美联储低利率、专利垄断、监管壁垒）制造了“人为资本家”（crony capitalists），他们靠权力而非市场赢。
3. 中国/俄罗斯：权力直接就是生产要素——党/寡头控制土地、资本、资源定价。消费者主权？不存在的，强制主权才是王道。
权力加入后，框架的剧变
原来的纯经济学框架：
* 无剥削 → 只有合作
* 无阶级对立 → 只有动态调整
* 消费者主权 → 最无情绞肉机
加了权力后，变成政治经济学：
* 剥削重现：权力持有者（政府、寡头、游说集团）可以用强制提取租金（税、垄断、战争）。
* 阶级对立复活：不是资本家 vs 工人，而是权力精英 vs 无权力大众（或“政治手段 vs 经济手段”）。
* 消费者主权被劫持：你以为你在投票买东西？其实权力先决定了你能买什么、价格多少（关税、补贴、禁令）。
* 革命的讽刺：洗牌后，新权力持有者又制造新差距（苏联/中国历史铁证）。
框架维度纯经济学（无权力）政治经济学（加权力）
生产要素土地、劳动、资本、企业家+ 权力（强制、垄断、暴力）
定价机制企业家预期 + 消费者主观价值+ 权力强制（税、管制、战争）
差距来源能力/时间偏好/运气（自然分层）+ 权力扭曲（cronyism、腐败、遗产制度）
剥削不存在（自愿交换）存在（强制提取）
动态调整消费者主权权力主权（消费者被操控）
革命结果洗牌后自然再分层新权力集团制造更大差距
2025年代表观点Mises/Hayek：市场自由减少不平等Piketty：权力+资本导致r>g，需强制再分配
终极残酷真相（2025版）
在三维世界，纯粹自由市场从未存在过——权力总是潜伏在后台，像一个永不退场的“影子生产要素”。
奥地利学派（Mises/Hayek）说：差距是自然的，权力干预只会放大它。
Piketty派说：差距被权力放大，必须用更多权力（税、财富税）矫正。
结果？两者都对了一半，但都没逃出循环：权力永远是最大的赢家。
你这波补充，直接把理论从“理想国”拉到“现实地狱”——政治经济哲学的本质，就是权力如何伪装成生产要素，永续不平等。

2025-12-6

The wealth gap is not a systemic flaw! It's a fundamental setting of the three-dimensional world. In this material-based dimension, limited resources, unequal abilities, and unequal opportunities... these differences, when compounded, naturally create a class structure. Systems can adjust for these gaps, but they cannot eliminate them. Revolutions can reshuffle the deck, but they cannot prevent the world from becoming stratified again.

The price of all factors of production stems from their marginal contribution to satisfying consumer demand (the consumer's subjective perception of value, since value itself is subjective; there is no objective value, as exemplified by the value of water and diamonds), and is ultimately determined by entrepreneurs' expectations and bidding. Within this framework, there is no exploitation, only cooperation and exchange; no class antagonism, only dynamic adjustments under consumer sovereignty.

1. Limited resources → Scarcity inevitably leads to competition.

2. Unequal abilities → High time preference vs. low time preference, the compound interest gap widens exponentially.

3. Unequal opportunities → Information asymmetry, geography, family, luck… can never be symmetrical.

4. Subjective value theory → Price is not determined by labor, but by consumer vote.

5. Entrepreneurial expectations and bidding → The price of all factors of production is ultimately the highest price offered by those who "bet on who can better satisfy consumers tomorrow."

* Exploitation does not exist because all transactions are voluntary (either accept the price or withdraw).

* Class antagonism is an illusion because true "sovereignty" lies in the hands of consumers (if you don't buy, the capitalists immediately kneel).

* Revolution merely overturns the table; ten years later, a new table appears, the boss changes, and the gap remains.

* Any system that attempts to eliminate inequality will ultimately become a "new gap-creating machine" (because who decides who gets what? The power to decide is itself the biggest gap).

"Dynamic adjustment under consumer sovereignty" is the real killer move: consumers are the most ruthless voting machine and meat grinder on this planet.

Capitalists, workers, governments, revolutionaries… everyone ultimately has to kneel and listen to the subjective value judgments of consumers.

The gap between rich and poor won't disappear; it will only keep reshuffling.

This is the rule of the game in the three-dimensional world.

"This place holds the burial of all fantasies about eliminating disparity.

They died from subjective value theory, scarcity, compound interest, and human diversity.

All the factors of production mentioned above need to be supplemented with power, the factor of coercion. This is the most important factor in human history. Considering this factor, the pure economics above becomes political economy, and pure economic philosophy becomes political economic philosophy.

In the original framework (land, labor, capital, entrepreneurship), everything is based on voluntary exchange + subjective value + consumer sovereignty—which is beautiful, dynamic, and non-exploitative in an ideal free market.

But in the real three-dimensional world, the addition of power as the fifth factor (or "meta-factor") completely rewrites the rules of the game:

* Power does not produce wealth, but redistributes it (through coercion).

* It does not price by satisfying consumer demand, but by violent or legal monopolies.

* It breaks the premise of "voluntary exchange": either accept (taxes, regulations, monopoly rents) or be physically/legally eliminated.

1. 1. In some countries, the problem isn't overly free markets, but rather that power (corruption, oligarchs, racial legacies) distorts the market, leading to wealth concentration in the hands of a few with coercive power.

2. The real reason is that government intervention (such as the Federal Reserve's low interest rates, patent monopolies, and regulatory barriers) creates "crony capitalists" who win through power, not the market.

3. China/Russia: Power is directly a factor of production—the party/oligarchs control land, capital, and resource pricing. Consumer sovereignty? It doesn't exist; coercive sovereignty is king.

The dramatic changes in the framework after the addition of power:

The original pure economic framework:

* No exploitation → Only cooperation

* No class antagonism → Only dynamic adjustment

* Consumer sovereignty → The most ruthless meat grinder
After adding power, it becomes political economy:

* Exploitation reappears: Power holders (government, oligarchs, lobbying groups) can extract rent through coercion (taxes, monopolies, war).

* Class antagonism revives: It's not capitalists vs. workers, but the power elite vs. the powerless masses (or "political means vs. economic means").

* Consumer sovereignty hijacked: You think you're voting to buy things? Actually, power determines what you can buy and at what price (tariffs, subsidies, bans).

* The irony of revolution: After the reshuffling, new power holders create new gaps (ironclad evidence from Soviet/Chinese history).

Framework Dimensions: Pure economics (no power) Political economy (with power) Factors of production: Land, labor, capital, entrepreneurs + Power (coercion, monopoly, violence) Pricing mechanism: Entrepreneurial expectations + Consumer subjective value + Power coercion (taxes, regulations, war) Sources of gaps: Ability/time preference/luck (natural stratification) + Power distortion (cronyism, corruption, inheritance system) Exploitation: Does not exist (voluntary exchange) Exists (forced extraction) Dynamic adjustment: Consumer sovereignty Power sovereignty (consumers are manipulated) Revolutionary results: Natural re-stratification after reshuffling; new power groups create even greater gaps.

Representative viewpoints for 2025: Mises/Hayek: Market freedom reduces inequality. Piketty: Power + Capital Leads to r>g, Requires Forced Redistribution
The Ultimate Cruel Truth (2025 Edition)
In the three-dimensional world, a purely free market has never existed—power always lurks in the background, like a "shadow factor of production" that never leaves the stage.

The Austrian School (Mises/Hayek) says: Gap is natural; power intervention only amplifies it.

The Piketty school says: Gap is amplified by power, and must be corrected with more power (taxes, wealth taxes).

The result? Both are half right, but neither escapes the cycle: power is always the biggest winner.

Your addition directly drags the theory from an "ideal state" to a "real hell"—the essence of political economy philosophy is how power disguises itself as a factor of production, perpetuating inequality. December 12, 2025