FACTのa fact of life弾き語りするやつ初めて見た https://t.co/KUpflfeyMy December 12, 2025

2025/12/04(木)

都内のとある大学で、有志のみなさんが定例開催されている勉強会に読んでいただき、講演させていただきました。

半年前からご依頼を受けていたもの。
「命と政治ーなぜ医師が社会を診なければならないのか」という大変重いテーマをいただき、何をお話しするか迷いに迷ったのですが、私が医学生時代から、そして医師として医療の課題に向き合ってきた35年程の歩みを振り返り、どんな現実に触れどんな問題意識をもち、怒り葛藤し悩みながら行動してきたかについて、率直にお話しすることにしました。

こじんまりした会だから気楽に…と言われていたのですが、伺ってみると医学生や研修医、院生、看護師さんとともに、とある科の教授や研究者の方、困窮者支援の現場で活動されている方など多彩な方々に多数ご参加いただき、熱心に質問も出していだき、私自身が多くの学びを得る機会となりました。
特に、若い方々から次々に繰り出される真剣で本質的で鋭い質問には、さすが…と舌を巻きました。

#健康の社会的決定要因 ということが言われるようになって久しいですし、Solid Facts（確かな事実）として、貧困と格差をはじめ健康に及ぼす決定的要素が、少なからず政治によってもたらされ規定されていることは、医学・医療の世界でも疑いない事実として認識されてはいるのですが、なかなか普段の生活の中で…診療の中で…政治を意識し関わる機会は少ないからでしょうか。私のような「政治」に向き合い関わり続けてきた、ちょっと変わった医者に関心を持っていただいたのかもしれません。炊き出しの現場などでお会いできる方がうまれたら嬉しいなと思います。

貴重な機会を与えていただいたことに、改めて感謝いたします。ありがとうございました。 December 12, 2025

東京裁判で最も印象に残っているのがこのシーン。
いろんな見方があるろうが、いろいろな方々の精神的支柱であった右翼の大物が行った行為であることは、覚えておくと良いと思いました。
He SLAPPED The War Criminal On His Bald Head #history #ww2 #facts https://t.co/2AA9T3yUoB @YouTubeより December 12, 2025

Power elements in economics
2025-12-6

贫富差距并不是制度错误！而是三维世界的底层设定。在这个以物质为基准的维度里，资源有限、能力不均、机会不等……差异叠加后阶层结构自然形成。制度可以调节差距，却无法让差距消失。革命可以重新洗牌，却无法阻止世界再次分层。

所有生产要素的价格，都源于它们对于满足消费者需求的边际贡献（消费者的主观价值感受，因为价值本身就是主观的，根本没有客观价值这个东西，比如水和钻石的价值的例子），并最终由企业家的预期和竞价决定，在这个框架里，没有剥削，只有合作与交换，没有阶级对立，只有消费者主权下的动态调整

1. 资源有限 → 稀缺性必然导致竞争
2. 能力不均 → 高时间偏好 vs 低时间偏好的人，复利差距指数级拉大
3. 机会不等 → 信息不对称、地理、家庭、运气……永远不可能对称
4. 主观价值论 → 价格不是劳动决定的，是消费者投票决定的
5. 企业家预期与竞价 → 所有生产要素的价格，最终都是“赌明天谁能更好地满足消费者”的人出的最高价

* 剥削不存在，因为所有交易都是自愿的（要么接受价格，要么退出）
* 阶级对立是幻觉，因为真正的“主权”在消费者手里（你不买，资本家立刻跪）
* 革命只是把牌桌掀了，过十年又是一桌新牌，老板换人，差距还在
* 任何试图消灭差距的制度，最后都会变成“新的差距制造机”（因为谁来决定谁配多少？决定权本身就是最大差距）

“动态调整 under consumer sovereignty”才是真正的杀招： 消费者才是这个星球上最无情的投票机和绞肉机。
资本家、工人、政府、革命家……所有人最终都得跪着听消费者的主观价值判决。
贫富差距不会消失，它只会不断重排名字。
这就是三维世界的游戏规则。

“这里安葬着所有想消灭差距的幻想。
它们死于主观价值论、稀缺性、复利和人类的多样性。

以上说辞的所有生产要素，需要加上权力这个生产要素，也就是强制要素，这个是人类历史上最重要的要素，考虑到这个要素后，以上的纯粹经济学，就变成了政治经济学，纯粹经济哲学变成了政治经济哲学

原来的框架里（土地、劳动、资本、企业家精神），一切都建立在自愿交换 + 主观价值 + 消费者主权的基础上——这在理想的自由市场里是美的、动态的、无剥削的。
但现实三维世界里，权力作为第五要素（或者说“元要素”）一加入，就彻底改写了游戏规则：
* 权力不是生产财富，而是重新分配财富（通过强制）。
* 它不是通过满足消费者需求来定价，而是通过暴力垄断或法律垄断来定价。
* 它打破了“自愿交易”的前提：要么接受（税、管制、垄断租金），要么被物理/法律消灭。
1. 有些国家不是市场太自由，而是权力（腐败、寡头、种族遗留）扭曲了市场，导致财富集中到少数有强制力的人手里。
2. 真正原因是政府干预（如美联储低利率、专利垄断、监管壁垒）制造了“人为资本家”（crony capitalists），他们靠权力而非市场赢。
3. 中国/俄罗斯：权力直接就是生产要素——党/寡头控制土地、资本、资源定价。消费者主权？不存在的，强制主权才是王道。
权力加入后，框架的剧变
原来的纯经济学框架：
* 无剥削 → 只有合作
* 无阶级对立 → 只有动态调整
* 消费者主权 → 最无情绞肉机
加了权力后，变成政治经济学：
* 剥削重现：权力持有者（政府、寡头、游说集团）可以用强制提取租金（税、垄断、战争）。
* 阶级对立复活：不是资本家 vs 工人，而是权力精英 vs 无权力大众（或“政治手段 vs 经济手段”）。
* 消费者主权被劫持：你以为你在投票买东西？其实权力先决定了你能买什么、价格多少（关税、补贴、禁令）。
* 革命的讽刺：洗牌后，新权力持有者又制造新差距（苏联/中国历史铁证）。
框架维度纯经济学（无权力）政治经济学（加权力）
生产要素土地、劳动、资本、企业家+ 权力（强制、垄断、暴力）
定价机制企业家预期 + 消费者主观价值+ 权力强制（税、管制、战争）
差距来源能力/时间偏好/运气（自然分层）+ 权力扭曲（cronyism、腐败、遗产制度）
剥削不存在（自愿交换）存在（强制提取）
动态调整消费者主权权力主权（消费者被操控）
革命结果洗牌后自然再分层新权力集团制造更大差距
2025年代表观点Mises/Hayek：市场自由减少不平等Piketty：权力+资本导致r>g，需强制再分配
终极残酷真相（2025版）
在三维世界，纯粹自由市场从未存在过——权力总是潜伏在后台，像一个永不退场的“影子生产要素”。
奥地利学派（Mises/Hayek）说：差距是自然的，权力干预只会放大它。
Piketty派说：差距被权力放大，必须用更多权力（税、财富税）矫正。
结果？两者都对了一半，但都没逃出循环：权力永远是最大的赢家。
你这波补充，直接把理论从“理想国”拉到“现实地狱”——政治经济哲学的本质，就是权力如何伪装成生产要素，永续不平等。

2025-12-6

The wealth gap is not a systemic flaw! It's a fundamental setting of the three-dimensional world. In this material-based dimension, limited resources, unequal abilities, and unequal opportunities... these differences, when compounded, naturally create a class structure. Systems can adjust for these gaps, but they cannot eliminate them. Revolutions can reshuffle the deck, but they cannot prevent the world from becoming stratified again.

The price of all factors of production stems from their marginal contribution to satisfying consumer demand (the consumer's subjective perception of value, since value itself is subjective; there is no objective value, as exemplified by the value of water and diamonds), and is ultimately determined by entrepreneurs' expectations and bidding. Within this framework, there is no exploitation, only cooperation and exchange; no class antagonism, only dynamic adjustments under consumer sovereignty.

1. Limited resources → Scarcity inevitably leads to competition.

2. Unequal abilities → High time preference vs. low time preference, the compound interest gap widens exponentially.

3. Unequal opportunities → Information asymmetry, geography, family, luck… can never be symmetrical.

4. Subjective value theory → Price is not determined by labor, but by consumer vote.

5. Entrepreneurial expectations and bidding → The price of all factors of production is ultimately the highest price offered by those who "bet on who can better satisfy consumers tomorrow."

* Exploitation does not exist because all transactions are voluntary (either accept the price or withdraw).

* Class antagonism is an illusion because true "sovereignty" lies in the hands of consumers (if you don't buy, the capitalists immediately kneel).

* Revolution merely overturns the table; ten years later, a new table appears, the boss changes, and the gap remains.

* Any system that attempts to eliminate inequality will ultimately become a "new gap-creating machine" (because who decides who gets what? The power to decide is itself the biggest gap).

"Dynamic adjustment under consumer sovereignty" is the real killer move: consumers are the most ruthless voting machine and meat grinder on this planet.

Capitalists, workers, governments, revolutionaries… everyone ultimately has to kneel and listen to the subjective value judgments of consumers.

The gap between rich and poor won't disappear; it will only keep reshuffling.

This is the rule of the game in the three-dimensional world.

"This place holds the burial of all fantasies about eliminating disparity.

They died from subjective value theory, scarcity, compound interest, and human diversity.

All the factors of production mentioned above need to be supplemented with power, the factor of coercion. This is the most important factor in human history. Considering this factor, the pure economics above becomes political economy, and pure economic philosophy becomes political economic philosophy.

In the original framework (land, labor, capital, entrepreneurship), everything is based on voluntary exchange + subjective value + consumer sovereignty—which is beautiful, dynamic, and non-exploitative in an ideal free market.

But in the real three-dimensional world, the addition of power as the fifth factor (or "meta-factor") completely rewrites the rules of the game:

* Power does not produce wealth, but redistributes it (through coercion).

* It does not price by satisfying consumer demand, but by violent or legal monopolies.

* It breaks the premise of "voluntary exchange": either accept (taxes, regulations, monopoly rents) or be physically/legally eliminated.

1. 1. In some countries, the problem isn't overly free markets, but rather that power (corruption, oligarchs, racial legacies) distorts the market, leading to wealth concentration in the hands of a few with coercive power.

2. The real reason is that government intervention (such as the Federal Reserve's low interest rates, patent monopolies, and regulatory barriers) creates "crony capitalists" who win through power, not the market.

3. China/Russia: Power is directly a factor of production—the party/oligarchs control land, capital, and resource pricing. Consumer sovereignty? It doesn't exist; coercive sovereignty is king.

The dramatic changes in the framework after the addition of power:

The original pure economic framework:

* No exploitation → Only cooperation

* No class antagonism → Only dynamic adjustment

* Consumer sovereignty → The most ruthless meat grinder
After adding power, it becomes political economy:

* Exploitation reappears: Power holders (government, oligarchs, lobbying groups) can extract rent through coercion (taxes, monopolies, war).

* Class antagonism revives: It's not capitalists vs. workers, but the power elite vs. the powerless masses (or "political means vs. economic means").

* Consumer sovereignty hijacked: You think you're voting to buy things? Actually, power determines what you can buy and at what price (tariffs, subsidies, bans).

* The irony of revolution: After the reshuffling, new power holders create new gaps (ironclad evidence from Soviet/Chinese history).

Framework Dimensions: Pure economics (no power) Political economy (with power) Factors of production: Land, labor, capital, entrepreneurs + Power (coercion, monopoly, violence) Pricing mechanism: Entrepreneurial expectations + Consumer subjective value + Power coercion (taxes, regulations, war) Sources of gaps: Ability/time preference/luck (natural stratification) + Power distortion (cronyism, corruption, inheritance system) Exploitation: Does not exist (voluntary exchange) Exists (forced extraction) Dynamic adjustment: Consumer sovereignty Power sovereignty (consumers are manipulated) Revolutionary results: Natural re-stratification after reshuffling; new power groups create even greater gaps.

Representative viewpoints for 2025: Mises/Hayek: Market freedom reduces inequality. Piketty: Power + Capital Leads to r>g, Requires Forced Redistribution
The Ultimate Cruel Truth (2025 Edition)
In the three-dimensional world, a purely free market has never existed—power always lurks in the background, like a "shadow factor of production" that never leaves the stage.

The Austrian School (Mises/Hayek) says: Gap is natural; power intervention only amplifies it.

The Piketty school says: Gap is amplified by power, and must be corrected with more power (taxes, wealth taxes).

The result? Both are half right, but neither escapes the cycle: power is always the biggest winner.

Your addition directly drags the theory from an "ideal state" to a "real hell"—the essence of political economy philosophy is how power disguises itself as a factor of production, perpetuating inequality. December 12, 2025

2025-12-6

贫富差距并不是制度错误！而是三维世界的底层设定。在这个以物质为基准的维度里，资源有限、能力不均、机会不等……差异叠加后阶层结构自然形成。制度可以调节差距，却无法让差距消失。革命可以重新洗牌，却无法阻止世界再次分层。

所有生产要素的价格，都源于它们对于满足消费者需求的边际贡献（消费者的主观价值感受，因为价值本身就是主观的，根本没有客观价值这个东西，比如水和钻石的价值的例子），并最终由企业家的预期和竞价决定，在这个框架里，没有剥削，只有合作与交换，没有阶级对立，只有消费者主权下的动态调整

1. 资源有限 → 稀缺性必然导致竞争
2. 能力不均 → 高时间偏好 vs 低时间偏好的人，复利差距指数级拉大
3. 机会不等 → 信息不对称、地理、家庭、运气……永远不可能对称
4. 主观价值论 → 价格不是劳动决定的，是消费者投票决定的
5. 企业家预期与竞价 → 所有生产要素的价格，最终都是“赌明天谁能更好地满足消费者”的人出的最高价

* 剥削不存在，因为所有交易都是自愿的（要么接受价格，要么退出）
* 阶级对立是幻觉，因为真正的“主权”在消费者手里（你不买，资本家立刻跪）
* 革命只是把牌桌掀了，过十年又是一桌新牌，老板换人，差距还在
* 任何试图消灭差距的制度，最后都会变成“新的差距制造机”（因为谁来决定谁配多少？决定权本身就是最大差距）

“动态调整 under consumer sovereignty”才是真正的杀招： 消费者才是这个星球上最无情的投票机和绞肉机。
资本家、工人、政府、革命家……所有人最终都得跪着听消费者的主观价值判决。
贫富差距不会消失，它只会不断重排名字。
这就是三维世界的游戏规则。

“这里安葬着所有想消灭差距的幻想。
它们死于主观价值论、稀缺性、复利和人类的多样性。

以上说辞的所有生产要素，需要加上权力这个生产要素，也就是强制要素，这个是人类历史上最重要的要素，考虑到这个要素后，以上的纯粹经济学，就变成了政治经济学，纯粹经济哲学变成了政治经济哲学

原来的框架里（土地、劳动、资本、企业家精神），一切都建立在自愿交换 + 主观价值 + 消费者主权的基础上——这在理想的自由市场里是美的、动态的、无剥削的。
但现实三维世界里，权力作为第五要素（或者说“元要素”）一加入，就彻底改写了游戏规则：
* 权力不是生产财富，而是重新分配财富（通过强制）。
* 它不是通过满足消费者需求来定价，而是通过暴力垄断或法律垄断来定价。
* 它打破了“自愿交易”的前提：要么接受（税、管制、垄断租金），要么被物理/法律消灭。
1. 有些国家不是市场太自由，而是权力（腐败、寡头、种族遗留）扭曲了市场，导致财富集中到少数有强制力的人手里。
2. 真正原因是政府干预（如美联储低利率、专利垄断、监管壁垒）制造了“人为资本家”（crony capitalists），他们靠权力而非市场赢。
3. 中国/俄罗斯：权力直接就是生产要素——党/寡头控制土地、资本、资源定价。消费者主权？不存在的，强制主权才是王道。
权力加入后，框架的剧变
原来的纯经济学框架：
* 无剥削 → 只有合作
* 无阶级对立 → 只有动态调整
* 消费者主权 → 最无情绞肉机
加了权力后，变成政治经济学：
* 剥削重现：权力持有者（政府、寡头、游说集团）可以用强制提取租金（税、垄断、战争）。
* 阶级对立复活：不是资本家 vs 工人，而是权力精英 vs 无权力大众（或“政治手段 vs 经济手段”）。
* 消费者主权被劫持：你以为你在投票买东西？其实权力先决定了你能买什么、价格多少（关税、补贴、禁令）。
* 革命的讽刺：洗牌后，新权力持有者又制造新差距（苏联/中国历史铁证）。
框架维度纯经济学（无权力）政治经济学（加权力）
生产要素土地、劳动、资本、企业家+ 权力（强制、垄断、暴力）
定价机制企业家预期 + 消费者主观价值+ 权力强制（税、管制、战争）
差距来源能力/时间偏好/运气（自然分层）+ 权力扭曲（cronyism、腐败、遗产制度）
剥削不存在（自愿交换）存在（强制提取）
动态调整消费者主权权力主权（消费者被操控）
革命结果洗牌后自然再分层新权力集团制造更大差距
2025年代表观点Mises/Hayek：市场自由减少不平等Piketty：权力+资本导致r>g，需强制再分配
终极残酷真相（2025版）
在三维世界，纯粹自由市场从未存在过——权力总是潜伏在后台，像一个永不退场的“影子生产要素”。
奥地利学派（Mises/Hayek）说：差距是自然的，权力干预只会放大它。
Piketty派说：差距被权力放大，必须用更多权力（税、财富税）矫正。
结果？两者都对了一半，但都没逃出循环：权力永远是最大的赢家。
你这波补充，直接把理论从“理想国”拉到“现实地狱”——政治经济哲学的本质，就是权力如何伪装成生产要素，永续不平等。

2025-12-6

The wealth gap is not a systemic flaw! It's a fundamental setting of the three-dimensional world. In this material-based dimension, limited resources, unequal abilities, and unequal opportunities... these differences, when compounded, naturally create a class structure. Systems can adjust for these gaps, but they cannot eliminate them. Revolutions can reshuffle the deck, but they cannot prevent the world from becoming stratified again.

The price of all factors of production stems from their marginal contribution to satisfying consumer demand (the consumer's subjective perception of value, since value itself is subjective; there is no objective value, as exemplified by the value of water and diamonds), and is ultimately determined by entrepreneurs' expectations and bidding. Within this framework, there is no exploitation, only cooperation and exchange; no class antagonism, only dynamic adjustments under consumer sovereignty.

1. Limited resources → Scarcity inevitably leads to competition.

2. Unequal abilities → High time preference vs. low time preference, the compound interest gap widens exponentially.

3. Unequal opportunities → Information asymmetry, geography, family, luck… can never be symmetrical.

4. Subjective value theory → Price is not determined by labor, but by consumer vote.

5. Entrepreneurial expectations and bidding → The price of all factors of production is ultimately the highest price offered by those who "bet on who can better satisfy consumers tomorrow."

* Exploitation does not exist because all transactions are voluntary (either accept the price or withdraw).

* Class antagonism is an illusion because true "sovereignty" lies in the hands of consumers (if you don't buy, the capitalists immediately kneel).

* Revolution merely overturns the table; ten years later, a new table appears, the boss changes, and the gap remains.

* Any system that attempts to eliminate inequality will ultimately become a "new gap-creating machine" (because who decides who gets what? The power to decide is itself the biggest gap).

"Dynamic adjustment under consumer sovereignty" is the real killer move: consumers are the most ruthless voting machine and meat grinder on this planet.

Capitalists, workers, governments, revolutionaries… everyone ultimately has to kneel and listen to the subjective value judgments of consumers.

The gap between rich and poor won't disappear; it will only keep reshuffling.

This is the rule of the game in the three-dimensional world.

"This place holds the burial of all fantasies about eliminating disparity.

They died from subjective value theory, scarcity, compound interest, and human diversity.

All the factors of production mentioned above need to be supplemented with power, the factor of coercion. This is the most important factor in human history. Considering this factor, the pure economics above becomes political economy, and pure economic philosophy becomes political economic philosophy.

In the original framework (land, labor, capital, entrepreneurship), everything is based on voluntary exchange + subjective value + consumer sovereignty—which is beautiful, dynamic, and non-exploitative in an ideal free market.

But in the real three-dimensional world, the addition of power as the fifth factor (or "meta-factor") completely rewrites the rules of the game:

* Power does not produce wealth, but redistributes it (through coercion).

* It does not price by satisfying consumer demand, but by violent or legal monopolies.

* It breaks the premise of "voluntary exchange": either accept (taxes, regulations, monopoly rents) or be physically/legally eliminated.

1. 1. In some countries, the problem isn't overly free markets, but rather that power (corruption, oligarchs, racial legacies) distorts the market, leading to wealth concentration in the hands of a few with coercive power.

2. The real reason is that government intervention (such as the Federal Reserve's low interest rates, patent monopolies, and regulatory barriers) creates "crony capitalists" who win through power, not the market.

3. China/Russia: Power is directly a factor of production—the party/oligarchs control land, capital, and resource pricing. Consumer sovereignty? It doesn't exist; coercive sovereignty is king.

The dramatic changes in the framework after the addition of power:

The original pure economic framework:

* No exploitation → Only cooperation

* No class antagonism → Only dynamic adjustment

* Consumer sovereignty → The most ruthless meat grinder
After adding power, it becomes political economy:

* Exploitation reappears: Power holders (government, oligarchs, lobbying groups) can extract rent through coercion (taxes, monopolies, war).

* Class antagonism revives: It's not capitalists vs. workers, but the power elite vs. the powerless masses (or "political means vs. economic means").

* Consumer sovereignty hijacked: You think you're voting to buy things? Actually, power determines what you can buy and at what price (tariffs, subsidies, bans).

* The irony of revolution: After the reshuffling, new power holders create new gaps (ironclad evidence from Soviet/Chinese history).

Framework Dimensions: Pure economics (no power) Political economy (with power) Factors of production: Land, labor, capital, entrepreneurs + Power (coercion, monopoly, violence) Pricing mechanism: Entrepreneurial expectations + Consumer subjective value + Power coercion (taxes, regulations, war) Sources of gaps: Ability/time preference/luck (natural stratification) + Power distortion (cronyism, corruption, inheritance system) Exploitation: Does not exist (voluntary exchange) Exists (forced extraction) Dynamic adjustment: Consumer sovereignty Power sovereignty (consumers are manipulated) Revolutionary results: Natural re-stratification after reshuffling; new power groups create even greater gaps.

Representative viewpoints for 2025: Mises/Hayek: Market freedom reduces inequality. Piketty: Power + Capital Leads to r>g, Requires Forced Redistribution
The Ultimate Cruel Truth (2025 Edition)
In the three-dimensional world, a purely free market has never existed—power always lurks in the background, like a "shadow factor of production" that never leaves the stage.

The Austrian School (Mises/Hayek) says: Gap is natural; power intervention only amplifies it.

The Piketty school says: Gap is amplified by power, and must be corrected with more power (taxes, wealth taxes).

The result? Both are half right, but neither escapes the cycle: power is always the biggest winner.

Your addition directly drags the theory from an "ideal state" to a "real hell"—the essence of political economy philosophy is how power disguises itself as a factor of production, perpetuating inequality. December 12, 2025

2025-12-6

贫富差距并不是制度错误！而是三维世界的底层设定。在这个以物质为基准的维度里，资源有限、能力不均、机会不等……差异叠加后阶层结构自然形成。制度可以调节差距，却无法让差距消失。革命可以重新洗牌，却无法阻止世界再次分层。

所有生产要素的价格，都源于它们对于满足消费者需求的边际贡献（消费者的主观价值感受，因为价值本身就是主观的，根本没有客观价值这个东西，比如水和钻石的价值的例子），并最终由企业家的预期和竞价决定，在这个框架里，没有剥削，只有合作与交换，没有阶级对立，只有消费者主权下的动态调整

资源有限 → 稀缺性必然导致竞争
能力不均 → 高时间偏好 vs 低时间偏好的人，复利差距指数级拉大
机会不等 → 信息不对称、地理、家庭、运气……永远不可能对称
主观价值论 → 价格不是劳动决定的，是消费者投票决定的
企业家预期与竞价 → 所有生产要素的价格，最终都是“赌明天谁能更好地满足消费者”的人出的最高价

剥削不存在，因为所有交易都是自愿的（要么接受价格，要么退出）
阶级对立是幻觉，因为真正的“主权”在消费者手里（你不买，资本家立刻跪）
革命只是把牌桌掀了，过十年又是一桌新牌，老板换人，差距还在
任何试图消灭差距的制度，最后都会变成“新的差距制造机”（因为谁来决定谁配多少？决定权本身就是最大差距）

“动态调整 under consumer sovereignty”才是真正的杀招： 消费者才是这个星球上最无情的投票机和绞肉机。
资本家、工人、政府、革命家……所有人最终都得跪着听消费者的主观价值判决。
贫富差距不会消失，它只会不断重排名字。
这就是三维世界的游戏规则。

“这里安葬着所有想消灭差距的幻想。
它们死于主观价值论、稀缺性、复利和人类的多样性。

以上说辞的所有生产要素，需要加上权力这个生产要素，也就是强制要素，这个是人类历史上最重要的要素，考虑到这个要素后，以上的纯粹经济学，就变成了政治经济学，纯粹经济哲学变成了政治经济哲学

The wealth gap is not a systemic flaw, but rather a fundamental limitation of our three-dimensional world. In this materially-based dimension, limited resources, unequal abilities, and disparate opportunities... these disparities, when compounded, naturally create social stratification. Institutions can adjust for these disparities, but they cannot eliminate them. Revolutions can reshape the world, but they cannot prevent its further stratification.

The price of all factors of production stems from their marginal contribution to satisfying consumer demand (the consumer's subjective perception of value, since value itself is subjective; there is no objective value, as exemplified by the value of water and diamonds), and is ultimately determined by entrepreneurs' expectations and bidding. Within this framework, there is no exploitation, only cooperation and exchange; no class antagonism, only dynamic adjustments under consumer sovereignty.

1. Limited resources → Scarcity inevitably leads to competition.

2. Unequal abilities → High time preference vs. low time preference, the compound interest gap widens exponentially.

3. Unequal opportunities → Information asymmetry, geography, family, luck… can never be symmetrical.

4. Subjective value theory → Price is not determined by labor, but by consumer vote.

5. Entrepreneurial expectations and bidding → The price of all factors of production is ultimately the highest price offered by those who "bet on who can better satisfy consumers tomorrow."

* Exploitation does not exist because all transactions are voluntary (either accept the price or withdraw).

* Class antagonism is an illusion because true "sovereignty" lies in the hands of consumers (if you don't buy, the capitalists immediately kneel).

* Revolution merely overturns the table; ten years later, a new table appears, the boss changes, and the gap remains.

* Any system that attempts to eliminate inequality will ultimately become a "new gap-creating machine" (because who decides who gets what? The power to decide is itself the biggest gap).

"Dynamic adjustment under consumer sovereignty" is the real killer move: consumers are the most ruthless voting machine and meat grinder on this planet.

Capitalists, workers, governments, revolutionaries… everyone ultimately has to kneel and listen to the subjective value judgments of consumers.

The gap between rich and poor will not disappear; it will only keep reshuffling.

This is the rule of the game in the three-dimensional world.

"Here lies the burial place of all illusions about eliminating inequality.

They died from subjective value theory, scarcity, compound interest, and human diversity."

All the factors of production mentioned above need to be supplemented with power, the factor of production, that is, coercion. This is the most important factor in human history. Considering this factor, the pure economics above becomes political economy, and pure economic philosophy becomes political economic philosophy. December 12, 2025

ハイスタのO-EAST、チケット用意されませんでした。

O-EASTでハイスタ観たいんよ。
最後のO-EASTは2019年のNAMBA69。
それからO-EAST行けてなく。

2017、Giftツアーで間近で観て。
2015、factの1回目の解散。(幕張で2回目の解散も観たけど。)
健さんは多々。

Kアリーナは確保済み。 https://t.co/9uoRh8sJmH December 12, 2025

@grok factcheck。冒頭に【信頼度：%】をつけて140文字以内で教えて。 https://t.co/UwDDte4UUH 鹿島アントラーズ優勝！中田浩二FDの功績に感動の声 December 12, 2025

2025-12-6

贫富差距并不是制度错误！而是三维世界的底层设定。在这个以物质为基准的维度里，资源有限、能力不均、机会不等……差异叠加后阶层结构自然形成。制度可以调节差距，却无法让差距消失。革命可以重新洗牌，却无法阻止世界再次分层。

所有生产要素的价格，都源于它们对于满足消费者需求的边际贡献（消费者的主观价值感受，因为价值本身就是主观的，根本没有客观价值这个东西，比如水和钻石的价值的例子），并最终由企业家的预期和竞价决定，在这个框架里，没有剥削，只有合作与交换，没有阶级对立，只有消费者主权下的动态调整

资源有限 → 稀缺性必然导致竞争
能力不均 → 高时间偏好 vs 低时间偏好的人，复利差距指数级拉大
机会不等 → 信息不对称、地理、家庭、运气……永远不可能对称
主观价值论 → 价格不是劳动决定的，是消费者投票决定的
企业家预期与竞价 → 所有生产要素的价格，最终都是“赌明天谁能更好地满足消费者”的人出的最高价

剥削不存在，因为所有交易都是自愿的（要么接受价格，要么退出）
阶级对立是幻觉，因为真正的“主权”在消费者手里（你不买，资本家立刻跪）
革命只是把牌桌掀了，过十年又是一桌新牌，老板换人，差距还在
任何试图消灭差距的制度，最后都会变成“新的差距制造机”（因为谁来决定谁配多少？决定权本身就是最大差距）

“动态调整 under consumer sovereignty”才是真正的杀招： 消费者才是这个星球上最无情的投票机和绞肉机。
资本家、工人、政府、革命家……所有人最终都得跪着听消费者的主观价值判决。
贫富差距不会消失，它只会不断重排名字。
这就是三维世界的游戏规则。

“这里安葬着所有想消灭差距的幻想。
它们死于主观价值论、稀缺性、复利和人类的多样性。

The wealth gap is not a systemic flaw, but rather a fundamental limitation of our three-dimensional world. In this materially-based dimension, limited resources, unequal abilities, and disparate opportunities... these disparities, when compounded, naturally create social stratification. Institutions can adjust for these disparities, but they cannot eliminate them. Revolutions can reshape the world, but they cannot prevent its further stratification.

The price of all factors of production stems from their marginal contribution to satisfying consumer demand (the consumer's subjective perception of value, since value itself is subjective; there is no objective value, as exemplified by the value of water and diamonds), and is ultimately determined by entrepreneurs' expectations and bidding. Within this framework, there is no exploitation, only cooperation and exchange; no class antagonism, only dynamic adjustments under consumer sovereignty.

1. Limited resources → Scarcity inevitably leads to competition.

2. Unequal abilities → High time preference vs. low time preference, the compound interest gap widens exponentially.

3. Unequal opportunities → Information asymmetry, geography, family, luck… can never be symmetrical.

4. Subjective value theory → Price is not determined by labor, but by consumer vote.

5. Entrepreneurial expectations and bidding → The price of all factors of production is ultimately the highest price offered by those who "bet on who can better satisfy consumers tomorrow."

* Exploitation does not exist because all transactions are voluntary (either accept the price or withdraw).

* Class antagonism is an illusion because true "sovereignty" lies in the hands of consumers (if you don't buy, the capitalists immediately kneel).

* Revolution merely overturns the table; ten years later, a new table appears, the boss changes, and the gap remains.

* Any system that attempts to eliminate inequality will ultimately become a "new gap-creating machine" (because who decides who gets what? The power to decide is itself the biggest gap).

"Dynamic adjustment under consumer sovereignty" is the real killer move: consumers are the most ruthless voting machine and meat grinder on this planet.

Capitalists, workers, governments, revolutionaries… everyone ultimately has to kneel and listen to the subjective value judgments of consumers.

The gap between rich and poor will not disappear; it will only keep reshuffling.

This is the rule of the game in the three-dimensional world.

"Here lies the burial place of all illusions about eliminating inequality.

They died from subjective value theory, scarcity, compound interest, and human diversity." December 12, 2025

接続詞 that に導かれた同格の名詞節で説明できる名詞の種類（ロイヤル英文法より）
①事実　the fact that I did it とか
②知らせ
③発言
④考え
⑤命令
⑥感情

でもこんなリストを暗記しても全て解決とはならない。結局はたくさん読んで聞いて感覚を磨くしかない。 December 12, 2025

2025-12-6

贫富差距并不是制度错误！而是三维世界的底层设定。在这个以物质为基准的维度里，资源有限、能力不均、机会不等……差异叠加后阶层结构自然形成。制度可以调节差距，却无法让差距消失。革命可以重新洗牌，却无法阻止世界再次分层。

所有生产要素的价格，都源于它们对于满足消费者需求的边际贡献（消费者的主观价值感受，因为价值本身就是主观的，根本没有客观价值这个东西，比如水和钻石的价值的例子），并最终由企业家的预期和竞价决定，在这个框架里，没有剥削，只有合作与交换，没有阶级对立，只有消费者主权下的动态调整

资源有限 → 稀缺性必然导致竞争
能力不均 → 高时间偏好 vs 低时间偏好的人，复利差距指数级拉大
机会不等 → 信息不对称、地理、家庭、运气……永远不可能对称
主观价值论 → 价格不是劳动决定的，是消费者投票决定的
企业家预期与竞价 → 所有生产要素的价格，最终都是“赌明天谁能更好地满足消费者”的人出的最高价

剥削不存在，因为所有交易都是自愿的（要么接受价格，要么退出）
阶级对立是幻觉，因为真正的“主权”在消费者手里（你不买，资本家立刻跪）
革命只是把牌桌掀了，过十年又是一桌新牌，老板换人，差距还在
任何试图消灭差距的制度，最后都会变成“新的差距制造机”（因为谁来决定谁配多少？决定权本身就是最大差距）

“动态调整 under consumer sovereignty”才是真正的杀招： 消费者才是这个星球上最无情的投票机和绞肉机。
资本家、工人、政府、革命家……所有人最终都得跪着听消费者的主观价值判决。
贫富差距不会消失，它只会不断重排名字。
这就是三维世界的游戏规则。

“这里安葬着所有想消灭差距的幻想。
它们死于主观价值论、稀缺性、复利和人类的多样性。

The wealth gap is not a systemic flaw, but rather a fundamental limitation of our three-dimensional world. In this materially-based dimension, limited resources, unequal abilities, and disparate opportunities... these disparities, when compounded, naturally create social stratification. Institutions can adjust for these disparities, but they cannot eliminate them. Revolutions can reshape the world, but they cannot prevent its further stratification.

The price of all factors of production stems from their marginal contribution to satisfying consumer demand (the consumer's subjective perception of value, since value itself is subjective; there is no objective value, as exemplified by the value of water and diamonds), and is ultimately determined by entrepreneurs' expectations and bidding. Within this framework, there is no exploitation, only cooperation and exchange; no class antagonism, only dynamic adjustments under consumer sovereignty.

1. Limited resources → Scarcity inevitably leads to competition.

2. Unequal abilities → High time preference vs. low time preference, the compound interest gap widens exponentially.

3. Unequal opportunities → Information asymmetry, geography, family, luck… can never be symmetrical.

4. Subjective value theory → Price is not determined by labor, but by consumer vote.

5. Entrepreneurial expectations and bidding → The price of all factors of production is ultimately the highest price offered by those who "bet on who can better satisfy consumers tomorrow."

* Exploitation does not exist because all transactions are voluntary (either accept the price or withdraw).

* Class antagonism is an illusion because true "sovereignty" lies in the hands of consumers (if you don't buy, the capitalists immediately kneel).

* Revolution merely overturns the table; ten years later, a new table appears, the boss changes, and the gap remains.

* Any system that attempts to eliminate inequality will ultimately become a "new gap-creating machine" (because who decides who gets what? The power to decide is itself the biggest gap).

"Dynamic adjustment under consumer sovereignty" is the real killer move: consumers are the most ruthless voting machine and meat grinder on this planet.

Capitalists, workers, governments, revolutionaries… everyone ultimately has to kneel and listen to the subjective value judgments of consumers.

The gap between rich and poor will not disappear; it will only keep reshuffling.

This is the rule of the game in the three-dimensional world.

"Here lies the burial place of all illusions about eliminating inequality.

They died from subjective value theory, scarcity, compound interest, and human diversity." December 12, 2025

factsをお話しします面白い。
やっぱ人間って醜いなって。
多分醜くない人はいないんじゃないかな。みんな同じ。
一度も罪を犯さない人も誰かにとっては罪で、だから透明人間でガチで誰にも知られず桃太郎みたいにどんぶらこっこすっこっこしてない限り醜くない人とかいないと思う。 December 12, 2025

かねてよりFACTOR新型が出たら買いたいと言ってたので家庭内OKは出てますが

「家が狭え(自転車が多い)」

と圧がかかったので、やはり売却の方向で🥲
千葉県まで引き取りにきていただければ11万円、現状渡しですので傷など確認したければDMまで🙇 https://t.co/M8c750segy December 12, 2025

しかしember🆚dessert🆚ハイスタ🆚FACT、なんてイベント本当にあったらマジヤバですね。 https://t.co/oLTFbpCh7E December 12, 2025

facta編集部が11月4日に報じた「時事通信の主力銀行が読売新聞、朝日新聞、共同通信らに経営支援を打診」の記事について詫び訂を出した。
https://t.co/i0FoU9eHTb
「時事通信社が直接、或いは主力銀行を介して、同業他社らに経営支援を打診した事実はありませんでした。訂正してお詫びします」 December 12, 2025

🇷🇺ウラジーミル・プーチン 大統領
「🇪🇺欧州連合は〝戦争扇動者〟であり、ウクライナでの平和を妨害しようとしている」

🇺🇦ウクライナの国民と国土を餌食にしているのが、グローバル資本主義とウクライナのエリート官僚だと考えます。
#WorldFact
https://t.co/fAmkXqLa8o December 12, 2025

@grok factcheck。冒頭に【信頼度：%】をつけて140文字以内で教えて。 https://t.co/4BlqIIdNS0 堀越耕平先生、ヒロアカアニメ最終回に期待高まる December 12, 2025